South Carolina Elections
- Lets Get Rid of the Nannies -
South Carolina Elections
- Lets Get Rid of the Nannies -
The South Carolina Legislature, The Senate and The House, currently has a shaky membership - straddling the sway line between respect for individual liberties and inclination against such freedoms, particularly against the freedom of tobacco use that ranges from disrespect to sheer hatred. For most of the two year cycle between elections, the best we can do is call or write them and hope they listen.
We are, however, at the golden time of this two year cycle where we can identify those who hate us and either run against them for office or vote against them, both in the Primaries and the General Election. (In fact, in this year of a four year cycle, both the entire House and Senate are up for re-election.) This page will help us do so.
First Things first:
Dates of Election Action
Filing period for elected office primaries
(Where you declare running for office)
Actual SC Primary Vote
(You decide who, from each party, runs for office)
SC Primary Runoff Vote
(to decide unfinished races from Primary)
General Election
(You decide who fills the office)
March 16, 12 Noon to
March 30, 12 Noon
June 10th,
7 AM to 7 PM
June 24th,
7 AM to 7 PM
November 4th
7 AM to 7 PM
The Primary: This is where incumbents and challengers for the same position in the same political party are held to an election. This is also where you get off your ass and vote - to either vote for the man who will respect your individual liberties or, if a guilty person is running unopposed, write in another candidate - at least let the man or woman know you are displeased with their stance enough to vote for anyone else but them.
The General Election: Where the final vote occurs. Hopefully, enough of us have gotten off of our asses in the previous eight months to have a good choice to select from in this election.
Below -
The South Carolina Races of Interest
The Primary results of June 10th and 24th were a mixed bag. In adding up all of the final races so far (where the party winner has no competition come November), there appears, thus far, a slight advantage toward our freedoms - i.e.; slightly more unknowns replaced known antis in both the House and Senate.
See the score-card for these Primary-Win-All races toward the end of this section.
Who do You Choose, or NOT Choose?
Never an easy question to answer, especially since our highly unbalanced lame-stream media of this state NEVER seems to ask candidates anything regarding their stance on smoking bans or cigarette taxes and they NEVER highlight anything an incumbent has done to force smoking bans or tax increases down our throats.
Below, based on their Bill authorship/sponsorship, voting record and public declarations of the past and present, I can attempt to tell you who is what according to the following color scheme:
RED This is our enemy. They have proven by deed or declaration that they
support smoking bans and/or cigarette tax increases.
ORANGE A dubious candidate. Either by hearsay, implied tendencies, website
hints or their personal attributes (i.e; medical doctor), these people are
suspect, but are preferred over a red name.
BLACK Unknown. Have no idea where they stand, but at least their website or
public declarations have not hinted at all that they are anti.
GREEN This would mean that I know concretely that the candidate is opposed to
anti-tobacco legislation and, thus, truly supports individual and private
property liberties. At the moment, I have very few with the courage to
come out and say so... cowards.
Additional Notes of Choosing:
•The below races are not a total list of races, just the ones where we need to take action. For a complete list of the guilty, visit my comprehensive lists.
•Also, please use the Yellow Box links at the end of each Legislative block to access all races as posted on SCIway and access the candidates websites to try and help you decide.
•I will indicate the party of the individual, R: Republican, D: Democrat.
•I hate to insult any Democrat freedom-lovers out there, but the fact is that the Democrat party, by and large, supports anti-legislation. There might be individual exceptions, but I know of none currently and that party will stick together to push the leader’s agendas - and the leaders of that party in this state ARE antis. Unless faced with a RED versus BLACK choice, it is in our interests, all else undetermined, to vote Republican.
•I also hate to insult any Female freedom-lovers out there, but, historically, woman vote for anti legislation. If a choice is between a man and a woman, and there is no other information, I’d choose the man - it’s a safer bet.
•General axiom of choice (like in roulette): When choosing between red and black (or orange and black), always bet on Black.
South Carolina House of Representatives
Election Races of Interest
House District: 3
Counties: Pickens
Incumbent
Skelton, B. R. - R
Challengers
Gale, Jason - D
House District: 22
Counties: Greenville Score: Win
Incumbent
Defeated
Challengers
Nanney, Wendy - R
House District: 69
Counties: Lexington
Incumbent
Pitts, Edward H. “Ted” - R
These two Legislative Seats
have no one running against the incumbents. Both men are extreme antis. I would humbly suggest, for those in these districts, that you organize a petition for a candidate to run against them.
House District: 74
Counties: Richland
Incumbent
Rutherford, J. Todd - D
House District: 66
Counties: Orangeburg
Incumbent
Cobb-Hunter, Gilda - D
Challengers
Hawkins, Tim - R
House District: 79
Counties: Kershaw and Richland
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Herndon, David - R
Gunn, Anton - D
House District: 99
Counties: Berkeley and Charleston
Incumbent
Merrill, James H. - R
Comment:
I strongly suggest you organize a petition for a challenging candidate, Merrill is a very active anti incumbent.
House District: 112
Counties: Charleston Score: Wash
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Sottille, Mike - R
South Carolina Senate
Election Races of Interest
Senate District: 2
Counties: Pickens Score: Wash
Incumbent
Martin, Larry A. - R
Challengers
Defeated
Senate District: 6
Counties: Greenville
Incumbent
Fair, Michael L. - R
Comment:
Fair is a dangerous anti - I strongly suggest you petition an alternative for the November elections.
Senate District: 16
Counties: Lancaster and York Action: Vote in General Election
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Mulvaney, Mick - R
Powers-Norrell, Mandy - D
House District: 45
Counties: Lancaster and York
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Long, Deborah - R
Thomas, Fred - D
Senate District: 22
Counties: Kershaw and Richland
Incumbent
Lourie, Joel - D
Comments:
Both of these incumbents are steadfast and uncompromising antis. They have repeatedly authored and pushed anti legislation. I strongly suggest you organize a petition to have an alternative come the november elections.
Senate District: 23
Counties: Lexington
Incumbent
Knotts, John M. “Jake” - R
House District: 117
Counties: Charleston Score: Win
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Scott, Tim - R
House District: 16
Counties: Greenville and Laurens
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Willis, Mark - R
Turner Jr., Michael - D
House District: 21
Counties: Greenville and Laurens Score: Loss
Incumbent
Defeated
Challengers
Wylie, Bill - R
House District: 81
Counties: Aiken Score: Loss
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Young, Tom - R
House District: 32
Counties: Spartanburg
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Cole Jr., Durham - R
Rothschild, Will - D
House District: 105
Counties: Horry Score: Wash
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Hearn, George - R
Senate District: 10
Counties: Abbeville, Greenwood, Laurens
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Compton, Dee - R
Nicholson, Floyd - D
Senate District: 32
Counties: Florence, Georgetown, Horry and Williamsburg
Score: Wash
Incumbent
McGill, Yancey - D
Challengers
Defeated
Senate District: 19
Counties: Richland Score: Loss
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
defeated
Scott, John - D
Senate District: 17
Counties: Chester, Fairfield, Union and York Action: Vote in Runoff Primary
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Bennett, Mark - R
Coleman, Creighton B. - D
Senate District: 12
Counties: Spartanburg Score: Wash
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Bright, Lee - R
defeated
House District: 36
Counties: Spartanburg Score: Win
Incumbent
Open
Challengers
Allison, Rita - R
Senate District: 7
Counties: Greenville
Incumbent
Anderson, Ralph - D
Challengers
Garcia Quintana, Roan - R
Senate District: 13
Counties: Greenville, Spartanburg and Union Score: Wash
Incumbent
Defeated
Challengers
Martin, Shane - R
Updated: 6/29/08
House District: 20
Counties: Greenville Score: Wash
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Hamilton, Dan - R
House District: 108
Counties: Charleston and Georgetown Action: Vote in General Election
Incumbent
Miller, Vida O. - D
Challengers
Kelso, Jill - R
House District: 77
Counties: Richland
Incumbent
Open
Challengers
Koska, Michael - R
McEachern, Joe - D
House District: 25
Counties: Greenville
Incumbent
Allen, Karl - D
Challengers
Freeman, Rick - R
House District: 23
Counties: Greenville
Incumbent
Defeated
Challengers
Dillard, Chandra - D
Alexander, Justin - R
Senate District: 28
Counties: Dillon, Horry, Marion and Marlboro
Incumbent
Elliott, Dick - D
Challengers
McKown, William - R
House District: 34
Counties: Spartanburg
Incumbent
OPEN
Challengers
Forrester, Mike - R
Hart, Ronnie - D
House District: 35
Counties: Spartanburg Score: Wash
Incumbent
Kelly, Keith - R
Challengers
Defeated
House District: 97
Counties: Dorchester
Incumbent
Knight, Patsy - D
Challengers
Bailey, George - R
House District: 119
Counties: Charleston Action: Vote in General Election
Incumbent
Stavrinakis, Leon - D
Challengers
Cannon, Chris - R
Senate District: 11
Counties: Spartanburg Action: Vote in General Election
Incumbent
Reese, Glenn - D
Challengers
Gardner, Mike - R
Senate District: 33
Counties: Horry Score: Wash
Incumbent
Rankin, Luke - D
Challengers
Defeated
Senate District: 35
Counties: Lee and Sumter
Incumbent
Leventis, Phil - D
Challengers
Michalik, Karen - R
Senate District: 38
Counties: Charleston and Dorchester Score: Win
Incumbent
Defeated
Challengers
Rose, Mike - R
Senate District: 42
Counties: Charleston
Incumbent
Ford, Robert - D
Challengers
Sheriff, Scotty - R
Senate District: 46
Counties: Beauford
Incumbent
Defeated
Challengers
Davis, Tom - R
Fletcher, Kit - D
Comment: Trying to confirm Herndon, one way or the other. No info on Gunn yet.
Comment: Young, unfortunately, does support a tax increase. Don’t know his position on a ban - He won’t answer email... coward!
Comment: Skelton is a confirmed anti. Yet to get info on Gale.
Comment: Willis is suspect - I will try and confirm. No info on Turner yet.
Comment: Don’t have any info on Alexander, but Dillard is a confirmed anti from Greenville City Council. Please vote for Alexander.
Comment: Allen has voted with anti in the House. No info on Freeman yet.
Comment: No information yet on anyone here.
Comment: No concrete information yet on anyone here.
Comment: No concrete information yet on anyone here.
Comment: Cobb-Hunter is a confirmed anti incumbent, who has sponsored anti legislation. No info on Hawkins yet.
Comment: No information on either candidate yet.
Comment: Knight has voted with anti. No info on Bailey yet.